Masculine Identity in Hardys Novels :: Biography Biographies Essays

Masculine Identity in Hardys NovelsIn Hardys novels, masculine identity operator is explored, evolving from the solid, monolithic, patriarchal role of the mid-1800s, to less typical, nearly feminine styles of manhood. With the increasing power of women during the victorian Era, Hardy creates men who are in a state of ambivalence about their sexuality they either reach for the well-worn stereotype of the manly man, or they attempt to explore their own complicated emotions, sensitive to the needs of the emerging immature Woman. Though action in Hardys novels centers predominately around the female person, life is often seen finished the eyes of the males in his works. The typical male is often associated with money, power, and prestige, while the realists and chaste men are almost unmasculine in thoughts and action, and frequently fall victim to the New Woman. By depicting a man like Henchard, who goes from being an obsessive power seeker to one who is, in a sense, unmanned, Hardy shows readers the male identity which he tends to favor. The state of the economy and the political events of the 1880s and 1890s were unstable, and in their public roles, men began to feel gradually overwhelmed. Their personal lives were even more chaotic, as women began to challenge old ideas with their new, feminist ones. The Woman Question was ubiquitous, and women were gradually given rights that they never before had the Married Womens Property Act, two Matrimonial Causes Acts, and the Maintenance of Wives Act, were trinity laws which allowed for more equality in marriage. The introduction of birth control literature also significantly changed womens attitudes toward their sexuality and matrimonial duties. Federico maintains that as a result of these changes, go existed during the era. Men meditated upon their patriarchal inheritance, and by the end of the century, contradictory middle-class attitudes still existed, contributing to the sketchy construct of Victorian masculin ity (Federico 18-19). Southerington has placed some of Hardys male characters into one of four categories (although it is important to note that these groupings are permeable, and characters are not confined to any one category) the virile romantic realist and chaste. Though virility in such men as Fitzpiers, Troy, Wildeve, and Alec dUrberville was believed to be the keynote to all that is best and most forcible in the masculine character (according to Grant Allen in the semiweekly Review, October, 1889), inwardly their egoist self-assurance was steadily eroded by perceived threats to their masculinity.

Hinduism And Buddhism :: Religion Religious Essays

Hinduism and BuddhismIntroduction-Hinduism and Buddhism be two of the five major religions in our worldtoday. They are widely practiced, and have survived for centuries. Both havesimilarities and differences, as do entirely forms of religion. Hopefully, in thispaper I will show you the staple fiber structure of all(prenominal) religion. I would also like toshow how they compare and contrast.Hinduism FoundationNo one is completely sure of where Hinduism was started and by whom.Their oldest written documents, the Vedas, were written down in 1000 B.C. butthey had existed orally long before. The Vedas are where Hinduism originated.Today, Hinduism is the worlds third largest religion. many another(prenominal) changes have comeupon Hinduism since they practiced it first. Hinduism includes many differentsects, or denominations, and public opinions that have arisen. Though, there are manythings in common with all of the Hindu sects. Their basic beliefs are what tiesthem together.Basic Beliefs-The religion of Hinduism teaches us that each living body, includinganimals, is filled with an eternal soul. Hindus say that the individual soul wasa part of the creator spirit, Brahma. It is each souls job and wish eventuallyto return to Brahma. It is not possible though because by a souls sins, andimpurities from the world, they are no longer pure and holy to return. Instead,a soul must become pure before returning to Brahma, who is absolutely pure.The process of becoming pure is so hard that no soul advise become pure inonly one lifetime. The soul is forced to live life after life until it is pureenough to return to Brahma. The cycles of rebirths are called samsara, or the round of Life, by the Hindus. When a soul is finally cleansed enough to breakfree of samsara it is called moksha. The soul returns to Brahma for an eternityof contentment and ecstasy.There is no one incorporating creed in Hinduism. A follower may chooseany god as their personal god, or may worship so me(prenominal) of them. Though to be aHindu there are certain things that a follower must believe in and live by.Their main beliefs are1. A belief in karma, the result of ones good and bad deeds in alifetime.2. A belief in dharma, Hindu traditions.3. A belief in the three main gods Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva.4. A belief in reincarnation after death.5. Honor for the sacred Vedas.6. A belief that, if lived a religious life, the Wheel of Life can endand achieve moksha.7. An honor for an ascetic religious life, to be an orthodox Hindu.

The Strength of a Single Parent Shown in The Scarlet Letter Essay

What is a maven arouse? Is it wiz who destroys their childs life? Is it one who ultimately drive outnot raise a small fry on their own? Or is it one who dedicates their lives to the well being of their kid? Imagine a parent, and for whatever origin they were left alone to raise a child. That parent you imagined has to work long hours just to put a meal on the table. That parent has to play the business office of the mother and father. That parent has no financial support. Unfortunately, in our society, this image of a single parent is looked down upon. There are people that dont realize how much a single parent goes through to give their child a better life. When it comes to the controversial issue of parenting, I believe that a single parent has the ability to raise a child just as effectively as two parents can. The reasons why are because the minor can learn life lessons that can only be acquired with a single parent, the single guardian can be the best choice for the young one, and a single parent has the ability to put all their attention and care to the son or young woman. Although some readers may object that it is impossible for a single parent to take care of a child than two parents, I would answer that it is not impossible. In The Scarlet Letter, a woman named Hester and her baby daughter Pearl were ostracized from society and the young mother was left alone to take care of her daughter. Ultimately, my goal is to demonstrate that a child with a single parent can be raised properly by using the example of Hester and Pearl. By being with Hester, Pearl got to experience a different manner in life which enabled her to see an outside perspective of Puritan life and learn moral lessons from it. Pearl was not born into the typica... ... (271). Hester had effectively raised a kidskin to become something that was not expected. Despite being shunned upon on, Hester found a way to positively show Pearl moral lessons with the scarlet letter. Even when the townspeople valued to take Pearl away from her mother, they were not triumphant to do so. The mothers life was solely about Pearl to keep her protected, warm, fed, clothed and loved. My conclusion, which is that ground on the success of Pearls life, is that a single mother can raise a child. A single parent has the capability to parent and love a son or daughter just as two parents can. A single parent sometimes is the best choice of who the minor can be with. A single parent may have challenges, but they can overcome them just to keep the child they love liveborn and well. Is it time now to realize what a single parent can truly accomplish?